Scott Reed AKA SRI

[Ayatollahgondola]

This thread will display the numerous lawsuits involving Scott Reed and SRI Restaurant Equipment and Design

[Ayatollahgondola]

P-LAINTIFF HAS GIVEN DEFENDANT $30,000.00 AND RECEIVED ONLY
$3,500.00 WORTH OF THE ITEMS ORDERED. BECAUSE PLAINTIFF CANNOT
GET BACK THE MONEY OR GET THE EQUIPMENT, YOU HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE
TO OPEN THE RESTAURANT AND IS LOSING $3,500.00 IN RENT PAYMENTS,
$200.00 PER MONTH FOR UTILITIES, AND LOST PROFITS OF AN
UNDETERMINED AMOUNT.
DEFENDANT'S FRAUD IS SUBJECT TO PUNITIVE DAMAGES IN THE AMOUNT
OF DOUBLE THE AMOUNT DEFRAUDED FROM PLAINTIFF.

b These representations were in fact false The truth was Q as stated in Attachment FR-2.b Pxl as follows:
HE DID NOT HAVE THE RESTAURANT EQUIPMENT THAT HE PROMISED TO
PROVIDE, NOR DID HE INTEND TO DELIVER. HE HAS STOPPED
COMMUNICATING WITH US. PRIOR TO THAT THE DEFENDANT COULD NOT
PROVE HE HAD ORDERED THE PROMISED EQUIPMENT.


DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF ATTORNEY'S
MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL— CIVIL

1. Attorney and Represented Party. Attorney ("name,): Michael l*'eisberci
is presently counsel of record for (name of party): Scott Reed dba SRl" Equipment and Desinn
in the above-captioned action or proceeding
2. Reasons for Motion. Attorney makes this motion to be relieved as counsel under Code of Civil Procedure section 284(2) instead of
filing a consent under section 284(1) for the following reasons (describe):
noncooneration of client

7. Other. Other matters that the court should consider in determining whether to grant this motion,are the following (explain):
client avoids communicating, breached his contract with me.


Please take notice that a(n) ________________________________________________ has been scheduled for hearing on
_______________________ at _____________________________ in Department ____________________________
of this court, located at ____________________________________________.
Civil Trial Assignment - Long Cause - Civil Trial Assignment
12/28/2009 08:30:00 AM 47
Gordon D Schaber Courthouse
Notwithstanding Local Rule 4.00(B), an additional trial date mandatory settlement conference is scheduled in this matter
unless vacated by the Court. All persons whose consent is required to effect a binding settlement shall be personally
present at this hearing.

NOTICE OF




JUDGMENT IS ENTERED AS FOLLOWS BY: THE COURT I I THE CLERK
4. I I Stipulated Judgment. Judgment is entered according to the stipulation of the parties
5. Parties. Judgment is

b.

for plaintiff (name each):
RAUL CASTRO
and against defendant (names)
SCOTT REED
I | Continued on Attachment 5a.

I for defendant (name each):
d.
H for cross-complainant (name each):
and against cross-defendant (name each).
• | | Continued on Attachment 5c.
H for cross-defendant (name each

TOTAL
$ 26,500.00
$ 5,380.16
$
$
$
$31,880.16

[Ayatollahgondola]

Dave Simas, dba D.B. Simas Woodwroking v. Scott Reed, individually et
al.
PLD-C-001(1)
CASE NUMBER
FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION—Breach of Contract


On or about (dates): August 16, 2008
defendant breached the agreement by I I the acts specified in Attachment BC-2 I X I the following acts
(specify): Defendants failed to pay balance due upon completion of the Project, as detailed in the
Contract signed by Plaintiff and Defendant.


Plaintiff has suffered damages in the amount of $11,475.00 for the materials and
installation.



JUDGMENT IS ENTERED AS FOLLOWS BY: Fl THE COURT , HTI THE CLERK
4. I I Stipulated Judgment. Judgment is entered according to the stipulation of the parties.
5. Parties. Judgment is
a. I x I for plaintiff (name each). c. [

Dave Simas, dba D.B. Simas

and against defendant (names):
Scott Reed, individuall; SRI Equipment
Continued on Attachment 5a.

b. for defendant (name each):
for cross-complainant (name each).
and against cross-defendant (name each).
I I Continued on Attachment 5c.
d. | | for cross-defendant (name each):
6 Amount.
a. I X I Defendant named in item 5a above must
pay plaintiff on the com plaint:

0) rn

(3) I I
(4) I I

(5) a

(6)

Damages
Prejudgment
interest at the
annual rate of 10%
Attorney fees
Costs
Other (specify):

TOTAL
$
$
$
$
$
$

11,475.00
785.00
12,260.00




ORDER TO APPEAR FOR EXAMINATION
1. TO (name) Scott Reed, individually
2. YOU ARE ORDERED TO APPEAR personally before this court, or before a referee appointed by the court, to
a. I x I furnish information to aid in enforcement of a money judgment against you.
b. I I answer concerning property of the judgment debtor in your possession or control or concerning a debt you ov
judgment debtor
c. I I answer concerning property of the defendant in your possession or control or concerning a debt you owe the defendant
that is subject to attachment
Date- July 7, 2009
Address of court I X
Time i
shown above I
J: 15a.m.
is:
Dept or Div -35 Rm.:
3. This order may be served by a sheriff, marshal, registered process server, or the following specially appointed person (name)'
Dave Simas, dba D.B. Simas Woodworking


Appearances:
Scott Reed failed to appear
Todd A Murray appears in person for Dave Simas
NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: EXAMINATION OF JUDGMENT DEBTOR
Appearances are as noted above.There is no appearance by Scott Reed.
The Court indicated its willingness to issue a bench warrant for Scott Reed's arrest, with bail set in the
amount of $2,450, if the judgment creditor produces proof that Scott Reed was served with the Order to
Appear no less than 10 days prior to this hearing.Date: 07/20/2009

ISSUANCE OF CIVIL BENCH WARRANT
The above-entitled cause came before this Court on July 20, 2009 for the examination of judgment
debtor Scott Reed. Mr. Reed failed to appear as ordered. The Court indicated its willingness to issue a
bench warrant for Mr. Reed's arrest, with bail set in the amount of $2,450.00, if the judgment creditor
produced proof that Mr. Reed was personally served with the Order to Appear no less than 10 days prior
to the hearing on July 20, 2009.
The judgment creditor has now filed the proof of service in this matter showing that Scott Reed was
personally served with the Order to Appear on June 27, 2009. Therefore, the Court shall issue the
requested bench warrant.
Counsel for the judgment creditor shall prepare the Civil Bench Warrant (Local Form CV/E-127A) and
Instructions to Serve Civil Bench Warrant (Local Form CV/E-127B) and submit both to this department
with a check made out to the Sacramento County Sheriff's Department for the cost of service. To obtain
a quote on the cost of service, you may contact the Sheriff's Civil Division at (916) 875-2665.
The Court finds that the party was properly noticed. Warrant ordered against Defendant, Scott Reed
with bail set at 2450.00. for failure to appear as ordered at the judgment debtor examination on July 20,
2009.
Date: 08/25/2009

[Ayatollahgondola]

That within four years last past an account was stated by
and between plaintiff's assignor, State Compensation Insurance
Fund and defendants, and each of them, wherein and whereby it was
agreed that defendants, and each of them, were indebted to the
plaintiff's assignor, State Compensation Insurance Fund for
insurance premiums for the period of July 6, 2005 to August 29,
2006 for Policy No. 1796512 in the amount of $7450.12 principal,
$848.64 interest from December 15, 2006 to February 4, 2008,
which said defendants, and each of them, promised and agreed to pay.
Ill
That no part of said sum has been paid.
WHEREFORE, the plaintiff prays judgment against said
defendants and each of them as follows: $7450.12 principal and
$848.64 interest from December 15, 2006 to February 4, 2008
together with interest at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum
from the date of filing this complaint, for attorney' fees in the
sum of $1000.00 pursuant to California Civil Code, Section
1717.5, for costs of suit incurred herein and for any other such
relief as the Court may deem proper and just.
Dated: February 4, 2008


Return to Court
Writ of Execution
This return to court represents a report of the levying officer's actions and an accounting of amounts collected
plus costs incurred pursuant to the requirements of Section 699.560 CCP or Section 488.130 CCP.
Court: Sacramento County Superior Court-Sacramento
Case: Northern California Collection Svs Inc of Sacramento A Corp
vs
Scott Alan Reed et al
Attorney. Northern California Collection Service
700 Leisure Lane
Case No: 34200800002971
Levying Officer 2008001390
File Number.

1. Judgment Amount Due
2 Interest Calculated on Line 15b of Writ
3 Writ Fees
4. Reimbursable Fees and Expenses
5. Line 19b Fees
$9,689.92
$50.41
$15.00
$40.00
$0.00
$9,678.72
$50.35
$15.00
$30.00
$0.00
$11.20
$0.06
$0.00
$10.00
$0.00
6 Totals (Line 1+2 + 3 + 4 + 5) $9,795.33 $9,774.07 $21.26

[Ayatollahgondola]

Case from Nevada County

Total amounl of judgment as entered or last renewed:
$ 21,774. 04
7. All judgment creditors and debtors ane listed on this abstract.
8. a. Judgment entered on (date): September 29, 2008

[Ayatollahgondola]

Case from Sacramento

6. Total amount of judgment as entered or last renewed:
$ 3348.64
7.CJAn 0 execution or attachment lien
;, is endorsed on the judgment as follows:
a. Amount:"$" 3348.64
b. In favor of name and address}:

Karen M Riso

DEFENDANT: SRI Equipment Brokerage Rental
Judgement Debtor

[Ayatollahgondola]

From Sacramento County

3. Judgment creditor (name): . Phillip Chang

4. Judgement debtor (full name as it appears in judgment): Scott Reed

Totel amount of judgment as entered or last renewed:
$ 5015.00 plus interest

[Ayatollahgondola]

Scot reed vs A & J Market

The essence of this litigation is that plaintiffs Ram B.
18 Kunwar. Kamalgit Kunwar and A & J Market lost more than $ 50,000
19 due to the fraud ? breach of contract and other wrongs of
20 defendants Scott Reed and his alter ego defendant SRI Equipment
21 Brokerage and Kimberly Nelson ( collectively" SRI" ).


The plaintiffs relied on the defendants false promises for
almost four months and lost their business earnings" Because of
the breach of contract of the defendants, the plaintiffs lost
business and they were unable to use the storage space for any
other purpose

[Ayatollahgondola]

Scott Reed vs Heny Aguirre

[Ayatollahgondola]

Scott Reed vs Jose and Maria Garcia

Plaintiffs paid defendant $24,000.00 on September 11,2006, for restaurant equipment that defendant
never delivered; defendant failed and refused and continues to fail and refuse to return plaintiffs' money.
Plaintiffs were forced to purchase restaurant equipment elsewhere.

[Ayatollahgondola]

Scott Reed, AKA SRI Restaurant Equipment is now operating as Restaurant Assets and Design

http://www.restaurantassetsanddesign.com/

The California Secretary of State is currently reporting that this corporation was suspended by the state.