View Single Post
  #35  
Old 09-26-2008, 11:49 AM
Ayatollahgondola Ayatollahgondola is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 108
Default Doty vs Bixby

Doty vs Bixby

This was the origination case which started the long litigation culminating in the settlement and permanent injunction in superior court

Quote:
Defendant owes me the sum of $3,509.00, not including court costs, because: Defendants roofed our house. The work had latent
defect that,despite best efforts, we could not locate. We spent significant sums roofing balance of house, seeking defect. Suffered
substantlallntenor damage. Defendants refused to help, told us leakage not result of Defendants' work. We identified hidden d f t
Quote:

recently under a/c. Also learned then of additional defects
Attached Files
File Type: pdf Bixby Vs Doty (small claims).pdf (95.2 KB, 783 views)
Reply With Quote