View Single Post
  #9  
Old 06-17-2008, 06:00 PM
Ayatollahgondola Ayatollahgondola is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 108
Default MJB Bixby vs Ed Brenner

This case was filed by Bixby naming his former attorney as plaintiff. Within the complaint was an allegation that Bixby performed construction work for Brenner as an offset for legal fees. Brenner's answer to the complaint alleged Bixby lacked a contractors license and lacked standing to sue for those, and that Bixby did not pay legal fees due to inability to pay.

Quote:
AS A FURTHER, SEPARATE AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE TO THE
23 COMPLAINT ON FILE HEREIN, AND TO EACH ALLEGED CAUSE OF ACTION
24 CONTAINED THEREIN, this answering defendant alleges that one plaintiff is not a
25 licensed contractor and another plaintiff has failed to comply with California's
26 Contractors License Law, including without limitation California Civil Code Business
27 & Professions Gode section 7159, and plaintiffs may not therefore maintain the
28 contract claims set forth in the Complaint.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf MJB Bixby vs Brenner.pdf (292.5 KB, 984 views)
File Type: pdf MJB Bixby vs Brenner cross cmplt.pdf (113.8 KB, 1031 views)
File Type: pdf MJB Bixby Vs Brenner answer.pdf (342.8 KB, 958 views)

Last edited by Ayatollahgondola : 06-21-2008 at 01:24 AM.
Reply With Quote