Public Document Distributors  

Protect Yourself!........Research Before You Sign Contracts Or Hire Service Companies..... Visit The "Research Services Offered" Topic For Info

Welcome to the Public Document Distributors forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Go Back   Public Document Distributors > Document Discussion Section > Document Discussion forum
Register FAQForum Rules Members List Calendar Downloads Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-13-2010, 06:41 PM
Ayatollahgondola Ayatollahgondola is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 108
Default US Loan Auditors vs Robert Jackson

Here's a link to that case:
http://publicdocumentdistributors.co...70&postcount=8

I saw this in the impleader:

Quote:
IMPLEADER
8 40. Plaintiff incorporates herein by this reference each and every allegation set forth
9 above, as though fully set forth herein.
10 41. Plaintiff is prepared to deposits with the court the sum of $3 000, the amount paid
11 by Defendant for the forensic loan audit. As Defendant admits. Defendant's lender JPMorgan
12 Chase/WAMU, have falsely and fraudulently handled Defendant's loan transaction, misstating
13 Defendant's income and failing to comply with the law. Plaintiff has done the work and job
14 Plaintiffwas contracted for, but in support of Plaintiff s 100% money back guarantee and as a
15 showing of good faith. Plaintiff hereby deposits with the Superior Court tmst account for the
16 case, the full sum ofthe cost ofthe audit, or $3000. Should the court determine that Plaintiff
17 did not perform the contracted work to eam the $3000, the funds will be available for retum to
18 Defendant.
So here's the head scratcher. On the first part it says they are PREPARED to deposit the 3K, but next it states they did so. And since when does the court use a trust account to hold funds for something like this?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Public Document Distributors 2011