Public Document Distributors  

Protect Yourself!........Research Before You Sign Contracts Or Hire Service Companies..... Visit The "Research Services Offered" Topic For Info

Welcome to the Public Document Distributors forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Go Back   Public Document Distributors > Main Document Forum > Real Estate professionals
FAQForum Rules Members List Calendar Downloads Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-11-2010, 11:16 PM
pddadmin pddadmin is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 160
Default DHI vs US Loan Auditors

Reserved for more documents from DHI vs US Loan Auditors
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-11-2010, 11:41 PM
pddadmin pddadmin is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 160
Default US Loan Auditors vs Nicholaus T'Souvas

US Loan Auditors filed suit Nicholaus T'Souvas to compel his wage claims be arbitrated in private instead of the California State Labor Commissioner

Quote:
5. On or about January 12, 2010, T'Souvas filed an administrative wage claim


19 with the Labor Commissioner challenging US Loan Auditors' alleged failure to pay
20 T'Souvas certain commissions. Proceeding before the Labor Commissioner is improper
21 both because T'Souvas was an independent contractor not an employee, and because

22

T'Souvas is required to arbitrate this claim pursuant to Section 13 of the Contract. See
23 Whaley Decl., Exhibit A, Section 13. Even if T'Souvas were an employee, by entering into
24
the predispute Contract that includes an arbitration clause that governs "any dispute arising
25 out of" the Contract, a contract also governed by the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. §§


^)f\ 1, et seq., T'Souvas waived his right to bring a claim before the Labor Commissioner


Quote:
promised rate of compensation of:
Commissions of 50% of the upfront fees charged to borrowers less $695.00.



Commissions earned February 24, 2009 to July 3, 2009 at 50% of the upfront fees charged to borrowers less $695 00, claiming
$10,663.75 less $2,270.00 paid. Balance claimed due: $8,393.75. See the attached Exhibit A.


Quote:
Independent Contractor is to be compensated on a commission basis only. If the Indcpendent Contractor's efforts result in the client ordering a loan audit through US Loan Auditors and legal processing through US Legal Advisors, the commission shall be 50% of the up front fee charged to the borrower for The loan audit less administrative expenses (currently S695), to be paid within 30 days of the payment from the Client and clearing US Loan Auditor's account.

By way of example, if the audit fee was $2695. the resulting commission would equal $1000
Attached Files
File Type: pdf Souvas.pdf (1.03 MB, 5858 views)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-12-2010, 03:23 PM
pddadmin pddadmin is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 160
Default Constantino Cruz vs US Loan Auditors

Public Document Distributors is soliciting for help in obtaining these case files. If you are close to this jurisdiction,
800 11th Street
Modesto, CA 95354


please contact us: Davi@PublicDocumentDistributors.com


Case Number: 399238
Case Caption: CRUZ, CONSTANTINO VS US LOAN AUDITORS
Case Type: SCDate Filed: 2010-04-27
Case Status: OPEN
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-13-2010, 12:10 PM
pddadmin pddadmin is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 160
Default USLA vs Robert Jackson

USLA sued Robert Jackson for defamation and other causes for protesting in front of their company headquarters


Quote:
On, Wednesday, July 7,2010, Defendant again parked approximately 300
25 yards adjacent to Plaintiffs property on the street at 9:00 a.m. and begin
26 to harass Plaintiffs employees and customers. Defendant flagged down
27 and pulled over new and old customers and talked about how "USLA is a
scam and not helping people." Defendant left at 4:00 p.m. Defendant
Attached Files
File Type: pdf USLA vs Jackson.pdf (331.3 KB, 4516 views)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-19-2010, 09:42 AM
pddadmin pddadmin is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 160
Default USLA vs Robert Jackson

This space reserved for more documents for USLA v Jackson
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-19-2010, 09:09 PM
pddadmin pddadmin is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 160
Default Stroud vs US Loan Auditors

Cori Ann Stroud sued USLA and US Legal advisors for fraud and breach of contract

Quote:
Why does the Defendant owe the Plaintiff money?
US Legal Advisors collected up front fees and provided no services. They were draft and file a federal lawsuit with in 2 weeks against my mortgage company with violations discovered from a forensic loan audit provided by their sister company US Loan Auditors. The company was misrepresented

Quote:
Why does the Defendant owe the Plaintiff money? Us Loan Auditors representitive stated they will provide an accurate and professional analysis of my loan scenario and loan documentation "a forensic loan audit" with a 100% money back guarantee. They misrepresented what my options, remedies, time frames, the company offers, expectations and the legal process was totally false. I was provided an incomplete/inaccurate loan audit.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf Stroud vs USLA.pdf (64.6 KB, 4440 views)
File Type: pdf Stroud vs USLA 2.pdf (60.6 KB, 4286 views)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-20-2010, 08:12 AM
pddadmin pddadmin is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 160
Default James Holiday vs US Loan Auditors


James Holiday Sued US Loan Auditors for failing to pay for services rendered

Quote:
Why does the Defendant owe the Plaintiff money?

Ryan Easley, an employee of Fast Point Networking Solutions performed 23.5 hours of work and successfully completed the task of installing the Time Matters software, while he was their he also successfully repaired several other problems however Jeff Pulvino, owner of US Loan Auditors refuses to pay.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf Holiday vs US Loan Auditors.pdf (53.0 KB, 4341 views)
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Public Document Distributors 2011